| 135 | 0 | 178 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 研究深度学习重建算法(DLR)对低管电压、低对比剂用量的头颈CT血管造影(CTA)图像质量的影响。方法 前瞻性收集我院2022年4月—2023年11月行头颈CTA检查的患者66例,并随机分为两组。实验组采用80kVp管电压,注射对比剂碘帕醇(370 mg I/mL)28 mL,生理盐水40 mL,采用混合迭代重建(HIR)和DLR的低、中、高强度算法重建出4组图像,分别命名为L-HIR组、L-DLRmild组、L-DLRstandard组、L-DLRstrong组。对照组采用100 kVp管电压,注射对比剂40 mL,生理盐水40 mL,采用HIR重建,命名为R-HIR组。测量并计算主动脉弓、颈内动脉、颈外动脉、椎动脉、基底动脉、大脑中动脉平均CT值、图像噪声(SD)、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)等客观指标,并对5组图像进行5分制主观评分。根据数据是否满足正态分布,选择采用独立样本的t检验或者Mann-Whitney U检验来比较各组的图像质量。结果 3组L-DLR图像在主动脉弓、基底动脉、椎动脉、颈内动脉的CT值均大于R-HIR组(P<0.05),L-DLRmild组在主动脉弓、颈内动脉层面的SD值与R-HIR组无显著差异(P>0.05),其余L-DLR组的SD值均小于R-HIR(P<0.05),L-DLRstandard组和L-DLRstrong组的SNR值均大于R-HIR(P<0.05),L-DLRstrong组的CNR值均大于R-HIR(P<0.001)。5组图像的主观评分分别为:R-HIR(3.93±0.27)、L-HIR(2.72±0.82)、L-DLRmild(3.34±0.82)、L-DLRstandard(3.52±0.6)、L-DLRstrong(3.61±0.79),除L-HIR组外均符合诊断要求。实验组有效辐射剂量较对照组减少了65%[(0.41±0.08)mSv比(1.18±0.12)m Sv]。结论 采用80 kVp管电压和28 mL对比剂,结合深度学习重建算法可在客观上获得与100 kVp管电压和40 mL对比剂相当的头颈CTA图像质量。该方法减少辐射剂量和对比剂用量,提高头颈CTA检查的安全性。
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm on the image quality of head and neck CT angiography (CTA) with low tube voltage and low contrast agent dosage.Methods A total of 66 patients who underwen head and neck CTA in our hospital from April 2022 to November 2023 were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into two groups CTA of the experimental group was performed using 80 kVp tube voltage,28 mL of contrast agent,and 40 mL of saline.Images were reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR),DLR at mild-,standard-and strong-strength producing four datasets of low-dose HIR (L-HIR),L-DLRmild,L-DLRstandard,and L-DLRstrong.CTA of the control group was performed using 100 kVp tube voltage,40 mL of contrast agent,and 40 mL of saline with HIR producing regular-dose HIR dataset (R-HIR).Objective indexes such as aortic arch,interna carotid artery,external carotid artery,vertebral artery,basilar artery,middle cerebral artery,image noise (standard deviation,SD)signal-to-noise ratio (SNR),and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were determined and the five groups of images were subjectively scored.The independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the image quality between the two groups.Results The CT values of three L-DLR image groups in the aortic arch,basilar artery,vertebral artery,and internal carotid artery were all significantly higher than those of the R-HIR group (P<0.05).The L-DLRmildgroup showed no significant difference at the aortic arch and internal carotid artery levels from that of the R-HIR group (P>0.05) whereas the SD values were significantly lower and SNR significantly higher in the L-DLRstandardand L-DLRstronggroups than those of R-HIR group (P<0.05).The CNR of the L-DLRstronggroup was significantly higher than that of the R-HIR group (P<0.001).The subjective scores of R-HIR (3.93±0.27),L-DLRmild(3.34±0.82),L-DLRstandard(3.52±0.6)and L-DLRstrong(3.61±0.79) met diagnostic requirements whereas the L-HIR score (2.72±0.82) was nondiagnostic.The effective radiation dose in the experimental group[(0.41±0.08) mSv]was reduced by 65%compared to that of the control group[(1.18±0.12mSv)].Conclusion The image quality of head and neck CTA with 80 kVp and 28 mL of contrast agent combined with DLR algorithm is objectively equivalent to that with 100 kVp and 40 mL of contrast agent.The radiation dose and contrast agent dosage were significantly reduced,thus improving the safety of head and neck CTA.
[1]余燕武,江敏,陆国云.头颈CTA对急性缺血性脑卒中侧支循环及动脉狭窄的诊断价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2020,31(12):862-866.
[2]齐天白,侯珺琳.最佳ASIR权重结合低剂量扫描方法在头颈联合CTA中的应用[J].中国医疗设备, 2017,32(1):67-70.
[3]张军,王剑虹,刘军,等.头颈联合CT血管造影在头颈动脉狭窄中的应用[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2013,19(2):97-101.
[4]高思喆,张斌,赵福新,等.基于全模型迭代重组算法(IMR)在头颈联合动脉CTA双低扫描中的应用[J].中国临床医学影像杂志, 2017,28(1):64-67.
[5]曹立坤,王沄,马壮飞,等.深度学习重建算法在超重者低剂量骶髂关节CT中的价值[J].影像诊断与介入放射学, 2024,33(1):37-43.
[6]ZHENG M W, LIU Y, WEI M Q, et al. Low concentration contrast medium for dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography by a combination of iterative reconstruction and low-tube-voltage technique:feasibility study[J]. Eur J Radiol,2014,83(2):e92-e99.
[7]王贤坤,邹才盛.不同管电压对头颈CTA图像质量及辐射剂量的影响分析[J].影像研究与医学应用, 2019,3(5):21-23.
[8]李杨飞,朱卫萍,侯怡迪,等.深度学习重建算法在低辐射剂量头颈联合CT血管成像中的应用价值[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2024,44(1):53-59.
[9]GREFFIER J, HAMARD A, PEREIRA F, et al. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT:a phantom study[J]. Eur Radiol,2020,30(7):3951-3959.
[10]DENG J T, MA T, YAN J, et al. Effect of low tube voltage(100k V)combined with ASIR-V on the visualization and image quality of the Adamkiewicz artery:a comparison with 120 kV protocol[J]. Diagnostics, 2023,13(15):2495.
[11]张大明,薛华丹,王萱,等. 80kVp管电压联合自动管电流调节腹主动脉及双下肢动脉CTA扫描图像质量的评价[J].基础医学与临床, 2016,36(8):1135-1138.
[12]赵正凯,周瀚,程绍玲,等. 80kVp低管电压扫描联合全模型迭代重建冠状动脉CTA成像的临床应用[J].大连医科大学学报, 2019,41(6):506-510.
[13]何霖,尹喜,王成伟,等. 80 kVp、低剂量对比剂结合ASIR重建在肺动脉CTA中的初步研究[J].医学影像学杂志,2017,27(2):254-258.
[14]蔡武,龚建平,胡春洪,等.全模型迭代重组技术联合低电压和低对比剂碘摄入量在头颈部CT血管成像中的可行性研究[J].中华放射学杂志, 2016,50(9):662-666.
[15]杨彦兵,田艳鑫,谢志远,等. DLIR算法在头颈CTA颅底血管成像中的应用研究[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2022,28(6):579-583.
[16]陆晓平,王沄,陈钰,等. 100kVp条件下深度学习重建算法对头颈CT血管造影图像质量的影响[J].中国医学科学院学报, 2023,45(3):416-421.
[17]樊敏,袁元,程巍,等.高速率生理盐水联合高强度深度学习重建算法对“三低”头颈部CTA图像质量的影响[J].中国医疗设备, 2023,38(7):90-95.
[18]侯平,唐丽,陈岩,等. 70 k Vp联合深度学习图像重建算法对胸主动脉血管内修复术后双低CTA图像质量的影响[J].河南医学研究, 2024,33(16):2906-2910.
[19]LI W J, LU H Y, WEN Y T, et al. Reducing both radiation and contrast doses for overweight patients in coronary CT angiography with 80-k Vp and deep learning image reconstruction[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2023,161:110736.
[20]杨硕,别依凡,庞国栋,等.深度学习图像重建算法在肝脏增强CT成像中改善图像质量及辐射剂量的应用价值[J].医学影像学杂志, 2023,33(5):785-789.
[21]TATSUGAMI F, HIGAKI T, NAKAMURA Y, et al. Deep learningbased image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography[J].Eur Radiol, 2019,29(10):5322-5329.
[22]LI J, WEI W F, SONG L N, et al. Double low-dose computed tomography(CT)angiography of craniocervical arteries using a test bolus of diluted contrast medium and a personalized contrast protocol[J]. Clin Radiol, 2024,79(11):e1330-e1338.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TP391.41;TP18;R816.1;R743
引用信息:
[1]张欣玥,王沄,陈钰,等.深度学习重建算法对低管电压、低对比剂用量的头颈CTA图像质量的影响[J].影像诊断与介入放射学,2025,34(01):3-8.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金(82001814)